tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3462242975774901312.post2857398843901561293..comments2024-02-29T02:52:55.821-06:00Comments on Muslims Together : India - Ghazni & templeMike Ghousehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01647894600183489442noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3462242975774901312.post-45899454277559764792007-03-12T09:01:00.000-06:002007-03-12T09:01:00.000-06:00Ghazni is still a heroic figure in south Asian cou...Ghazni is still a heroic figure in south Asian country.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3462242975774901312.post-67301359635417944412007-03-12T08:59:00.000-06:002007-03-12T08:59:00.000-06:00I do not know what are you trying to convey to peo...I do not know what are you trying to convey to people with this message . Mike i have no clue how would this bring better for the Indian people with your article.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3462242975774901312.post-56742570458347635112007-03-12T08:54:00.000-06:002007-03-12T08:54:00.000-06:00I do not agree with your point of view and specula...I do not agree with your point of view and speculation about the Muslim ruler being ignorant about the Hindus at the time. If you have read a book written by Yogi sikand that is good but it should not be a basis to conclude the final results about the Muslims rulers as u did in your article and i would suggest you as the historian look and review your history carefully and do not jump into conclusion. And do not forget the fact that a lot of Hindus were converted by Mohammad Bin-Qasam during this period. Today if you look Muslims in India they are not foreigner but the local Hindus at the time. There family tree falls in Hinduism. Only fraction of the Muslims came from Persia and other middle eastern countries. The point about looting the temple is generally wrong. You just can not support this idea on the basis on one book or an article.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com